Saturday, 21 November 2015

Sponsors of Anti-Labeling GMO Campaign


Remember the X-files series and the agents Mulder & Scully? Their leitmotif was “we have the right to know”. This is exactly what the human race is entitled to when it comes to GMO foods. For that reason, we should all actively take part in the movement against GMOs. It can easily turn out to be the most important fight of our lives.   


Maybe you didn’t know that from 2012 until 2014 in four occasions ballot measures/props (under No. 37, 92, 105 and 522) were proposed in the US federal states of California, Washington, Oregon, and Colorado in order to get labeling on foods containing genetically modified organisms. Guess what happened? They were all rejected. As expected, the most severe GMO labeling opponents were the exact same companies that used sponsorship and donations to make the highest money contributions in GMO labeling campaign.

A simple question arises here all by itself: “If something is safe, why not label it with a warning”? Or ask even a better one: “If something is safe, why should you label it with a warning”? We’ve managed to get our hands on the list of sponsors of the above mentioned US Anti-Labeling GMO Campaigns. Take a peek at the list of corporations that stand behind some of the most frequently used GMO grown foods – the “Big Five”.

                     **GMA member donations included in list
Sponsors of Anti-Labeling GMO Campaign
No.
Donor
No On 37
No on 522
No on 92
No on 105
1
Monsanto Co.
$8,112,867
$5,374,411
$5,958,750
$4,755,878
2
Dupont
$5,400,000
$3,880,159
$4,928,150
$3,000,000
3
PepsiCo
$2,485,400
$2,352,966
$2,350,000
$1,650,000
4
Grocery Manufacturers Association
$2,002,000
$11,000,000**
$169,190
$106,600
5
Kraft Foods
$2,000,500
-
$870,000
$1,030,000
6
BASF Plant Science
$2,000,000
$500,000
-
-
7
Bayer CropScience
$2,000,000
$591,654
-
-
8
DOW Agrosciences
$2,000,000
$591,654
$1,157,150
$306,500
9
Syngenta Corporation
$2,000,000
-
-
-
10
Coca-Cola North America
$1,690,500
$1,520,351
$1,170,000
$1,108,000
11
Nestle USA
$1,461,600
$1,528,206
-
-
12
General Mills
$1,230,300
$869,271
$695,000
$820,000
13
ConAgra Foods
$1,176,700
$828,251
$350,000
$250,000
14
Kellogg's Company
$790,700
$322,050
$500,000
250,000
15
Smithfield Foods
$683,900
-
-
$250,000
16
Delmonte Foods
$674,100
$125,677
-
-
17
Campbell Soup Company
$598,000
$384,888
-
-
18
Smucker Company
$555,000
$349,978
$295,000
$345,000
19
Hershey Company
$518,900
$360,450
$320,000
$380,000
20
Biotechnology Industry Organization
$502,000
-
11,200
$108,000
21
Heinz Company
$500,000
-
-
-
22
Mars Inc.
$498,350
-
-
-
23
Hormel Foods
$467,900
$76,803
$85,000
85,000
24
Unilever
$467,100
-
-
-
25
Bimbo Bakeries
$422,900
$137,460
$230,000
270,000
26
Bumble Bee Foods
$420,600
$52,365
$45,000
$50,000
27
Ocean Spray Cranberries
$409,100
$80,295
$35,000
80,000
28
Council for Biotechnology Information
$375,000
-
$12,827
-
29
Sara Lee Corporation
$343,600
-
-
-
30
Abbott Nutrition
$334,500
$185,025
$160,000
$190,000
31
Pinnacle Foods Group
$266,100
$175,425
-
-
32
Dean Foods
$253,950
$174,553
-
-
33
Cargill
$250,000
$143,133
$111,000
$135,000
34
Bunge North America
$248,600
$137,896
-
-
35
Rich Products Corporation
$248,300
$34,911
$30,000
-
36
McCormick & Company
$248,200
$148,369
$130,000
-
37
Flowers Foods
$182,100
$205,099
-
$250,000
38
Mondelez International
$181,000
$210,336
$720,000
-
39
Dole Packaged Foods
$175,000
-
-
-
40
Knouse Foods
$167,600
$20,946
$20,000
$25,000
41
Welch Foods
$167,000
$41,893
$30,000
$35,000
42
Land O'Lakes
$153,300
$144,878
$760,000
$900,000
43
Sunny Delight Beverages
$139,700
$30,547
$25,000
$25,000
44
Wrigley Jr. Company
$123,350
-
-
-
45
Tree Top Inc.
$110,600
-
-
-
46
Clement Pappas & Co.
$100,000
$30,547
-
-
47
Hilshire Brands Company
$85,900
$282,775
-
-
48
Hero North America
$80,800
-
-
-
49
Mead Johnson Nutrition Company
$80,000
-
$50,000
$50,000
50
Faribault Foods
$76,000
-
-
-
51
Solae Inc.
$62,500
-
-
-
52
Goya Foods
$56,700
-
-
-
53
McCain Foods USA
$53,400
-
-
-
54
Godiva Chocolatier
$42,700
-
-
-
55
B&G Foods
$40,000
-
-
-
56
Clorox Company
$39,700
$17,455
-
-
57
Bruce Foods
$38,500
$4,364
-
-
58
C.H. Guenther & Son
$24,700
-
-
-
59
Morton Salt
$21,400
-
-
-
60
Reily Foods Company
$18,400
-
-
-
61
Inventure Foods
$15,600
-
-
-
62
Hirzel Canning Company
$15,000
-
-
-
63
Idahoan Foods
$10,000
-
-
-
64
Sargento Foods
$10,000
-
-
-
65
Snack Foods Association
$10,000
-
-
-
66
Shearer's Foods
-
$36,656
$30,000
$35,000
67
Niagara Bottling
-
-
-
$10,000
68
Michael Foods
-
-
$30,000
-

Terrifying Facts about Monsanto


Have you already heard the name Gilles - Eric Seralini, his 2012 studies on GMOs and the controversy around it? Namely, Seralini is a French scientist who researched the behavior of rats fed with Monsanto's Roundup Ready GMO corn. The results were horrifying. The study found clear evidence of cancer development in rats fed on GM maize hence showing the link between pesticide-treated, GMO foods and severe health consequences as a result. Some of the tested rats later died.

The study was firstly published in the journal Food and Chemical Toxicology. Immediately after publishing it was followed by a wave of criticism of the biotech industry. Biotech "experts" have told that the study was extremely unscientific, with unprofessional methods being used, simultaneously highlighting that Seralini was biased from the beginning of his research. The magazine, which published Seralini’s study, changed its mind and withdrew the study.

Why? Allegedly, Seralini used rats with (supposedly) inherent tendency to develop tumors (Sprague - Dawley deformation) and he was also accused of not using enough number of rats per tested group (instead, Seralini examined 20 groups of 10 rats per group, 200 rats in total). That's it. These were Seralini’s “capital” mistakes.

But, check this out - 8 years before Seralini, Monsanto also explored rats-cancer-GMO foods connection and published the results of the study in the very same journal. Expectedly, Monsanto’s study showed no traces of cancer in rats. But there is a catch here. Monsanto used the same strain of rats as Seralini did later, and the same number of rats (10). At that time, no one complained on their results. The big question here is how far is Monsanto ready to go?

In June 2014 and July 2015 Seralini’s original study was republished in the journal Environmental Sciences Europe and by the International Agency for Research on Cancer, respectively.